Development and
Validation of RP-HPLC Method for Content Analysis of Didanosine
in Dosage Form
Revathi R.*, Venkata
Naga Suresh P.1, Koteswara Rao M.1, Ethiraj T.2,
Rajarajan S.3
1Dept. of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2 Dept.
of Pharmaceutics, 3 Dept. of Pharmacy Practice, The Erode College of
Pharmacy and Research, Erode-638112, Tamil Nadu.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: revathethiraj@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Objective of the present work is to
optimize condition to develop UV zero order, first derivative
spectrophotometric method and a simple, rapid and reproducible RP-HPLC method
for the estimation of didanosine in selected dosage
form. Chromatographic separation of didanosine was
achieved with chromosil column (150 mm x 4.6 mm i.d, 5µ particle size), mobile phase used was phosphate
buffer: acetonitrile: methanol in the ratio of
20:35:45 with 0.6 ml/min flow rate. The chromatograms were recorded at
248nm.The retention time was < 3 minutes (2.72±0.1). The method was
validated for system suitability, precision, accuracy, linearity and
robustness. The isocratic LC method offers simplicity, selectivity, precision,
accuracy and less time consuming. Hence these two methods can be used for the
routine analysis of the estimation of didanosine in
Pharmaceutical dosage form.
KEYWORDS: Didanosine, Accuracy, Linearity, retention time.
.
INTRODUCTION:
Didanosine (Figure 1) is chemically named
as 9-[(2R, 5S)-5-(hydroxyl methyl)oxolan-2-yl]-6,9-dihydro-3H-purin-6-one is
used as a anti-HIV agent. It is
metabolized intracellular by a series of cellular enzymes to its active moiety,
dideoxyadenosine triphosphate
(ddATP), which inhibits the HIV reverse transcriptase
enzyme competitively by competing with natural d ATP. It also acts as a chain
terminator by its incorporation into viral DNA as the lack of a 3'-OH group in
the incorporated nucleoside analogue prevents the formation of the 5' to 3' phosphodiester linkage essential for DNA chain elongation,
and therefore, the viral DNA growth is terminated. Solubility of the drug was
found sparingly soluble in water, slightly
soluble in methanol.
Figure 1: Chemical Structure of Didanosine
From the literature survey
it was found that few RP-HPLC methods in pharmaceutical dosage forms and in
biological samples was developed for the estimation of Didanosine1-5.
The developments of LC/MS/MS methods are also reported for the estimation of drugs6-9.
Jaiprakash N Sangshetti et
al developed simple colorimetric method for its determination10. The
specification and assay also are available in USP11. To best of our
knowledge, all the methods have been reported the retention time of more than 6
minutes. So the
principle objective of this present study was, therefore, to develop a new,
simple and specific HPLC method for assay of didanosine with shorter analysis time.
MATERIALS AND
METHOD:
RP-HPLC chromatography was
performed on a Waters -2695 separation module automatic HPLC systems with UV
detector and Yl9100 HPLC system with PDA detector. An Analytical Chromosil C18 (4.6 x 150mm, 5mm)
was used as a stationary phase. Afcosets digital
electronics balance, Alwa pH meter were used throughout
the particle. Drug sample of didanosine was kindly
supplied by Pharma Traini,
Hyderabad. Marketed formulation of didanosine
capsules were used for the estimation of drug content. Methanol (HPLC grade,
Merck), Water for HPLC (Merck), Acetonitrile (HPLC
grade, Fisher Scientific), Ortho phosphoric acid, Tri ethyl amine were used.
Standard
Preparation:
For the RP-HPLC method standard solution
was prepared by accurately weighed and transferred 10 mg of didanosine
working standard into a 10mL clean dry volumetric flask, about 7mL of diluent was added and sonicated to dissolve it completely and made volume up
to the mark with the same solvent (stock solution). Further 0.3ml of above didanosine stock solution was pipetted
out and transferred into a 10ml volumetric flask and diluted up to the mark
with dilutent.
Test Preparation:
Sample solution was prepared by accurately
weighed and transferred the capsule powder equivalent to 10 mg of didanosine into a 10mL clean dry volumetric flask. About
7mL of diluent was added and sonicated
to dissolve it completely and made volume up to the mark with the same solvent
(stock solution). Further 0.3ml of above didanosine
stock solution was pipetted out and transferred into
a 10ml volumetric flask and diluted up to the mark with dilutent.
Chromatographic
Condition and Analysis of Formulation:
Chromatogram was recorded using Waters
-2695 separation module, with a flow rate of 0.6 mL
per min at ambient temperature and the eluent monitered at 248 nm. The separation was done on Analytical Chromosil C18 column (4.6 x 150mm, 5mm) using 200 mL
of phosphate buffer pH to 3.5 adjusted with ortho -
phosphoric acid (20%), 350 mL of methanol (35%) and 450 mL of
acetonitrile
(45%) as a mobile phase. About 20 mL
of the standard and sample were injected into the chromatographic system with a
run time of 6 min and the areas for the didanosine
peaks were measured and calculated the % assay.
Validation:
The RP-HPLC method was validated for the
parameters like linearity, precision, accuracy, limit of detection (LOD), limit
of quantitation (LOQ) and robustness as per ICH
guidelines Q2(R1)12. To determine linearity a calibration graph was
obtained by plotting the graph with didanosine
from the concentration
range of 10 µg/mL to 50 µg/mL
against peak area. Precision was determined by performing intra-day precision and inter-day
precision. The
standard solution was injected for five times with short interval of time
(repeatability) and for five consecutive days (intermediate precision). The
%RSD for the area of five replicate injections was found to be within the
specified limits and results were shown in the Table 2. The accuracy of
the method was assessed by determination of recovery for three concentrations
(corresponding to 50, 100, 150 % of test solution concentration) covering the
range of the method. For each concentration, three sets were injected and
percentage recoveries were calculated (Table 3).
The robustness of the method was evaluated
by assaying test solutions after slight but deliberate changes in the analytical
conditions flow rate (±0.1ml/min), the proportions of organic phase in mobile
phase (± 5 %, v/v) and changing the column temperature (25°C and 35°C). For
each different analytical condition, the standard solution was prepared
separately and analysed.
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION:
Based on
interrelationship between columns, pH, mobile phase composition and its ratio
the optimized parameters were set and the peak was obtained at retention time
of 16.7 min (Figure 2).
The method shows good linearity in the
range of 10 to 50 µg/mL. The linear regression data
for the calibration plot are indicative of a good linear relationship between
peak area and concentration over a wide range and the value of correlation
coefficient was indicative of high significance. The data for validation
parameters were tabulated in Table 1.
Table 1: Data for
Linearity Study
S.N |
Linearity
Level |
Concentration
(µg/mL) |
Peak
Area |
1 |
|
10 |
1057205 |
2 |
|
20 |
1848398 |
3 |
|
30 |
2603891 |
4 |
|
40 |
3433898 |
5 |
|
50 |
4106800 |
Correlation Coefficient |
0.999 |
Table 2: Results for Precision Study
S.N |
Peak Area |
|
Intra-day Precision |
Inter-day Precision |
|
1 |
2608834 |
2592793 |
2 |
2608175 |
2585469 |
3 |
2613654 |
2601879 |
4 |
2621386 |
2598410 |
5 |
2632749 |
2608297 |
Average |
2616959 |
2597370 |
Standard
Deviation |
10283.8 |
8709.1 |
%RSD |
0.39 |
0.34 |
Table 3: Recovery
Study Results
% Level |
Amount of Std Drug Added (mg) |
Amount Found (mg) |
Peak Area |
% Recovery |
Mean Recovery |
50 % |
15.0 |
15.22 |
3749470 |
101.45
% |
100.27
% |
100 % |
20.0 |
19.93 |
4910900 |
99.65
% |
|
150 % |
25.0 |
24.92 |
6141156 |
99.69
% |
Table 4:
Robustness Study Data
Parameters |
USP tailing factor |
USP Plate Count |
% RSD |
|
Flow Rate (mL/min) |
0.5 |
1.48 |
2553 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
1.48 |
2679 |
0.2 |
|
0.7 |
1.48 |
1899 |
0.1 |
|
Organic Phase Composition (%) |
5% less |
1.57 |
2215 |
0.1 |
Actual |
1.48 |
1679 |
0.3 |
|
5% more |
1.69 |
1911 |
0.2 |
|
Column Temp. (°C) |
25 |
1.56 |
2245 |
0.3 |
30 |
1.69 |
2256 |
0.2 |
|
35 |
1.57 |
1968 |
0.1 |
The results of % relative standard deviation
(%RSD) of the peak areas of five
replicates for repeatability study and intermediate precision were found
to be 0.39 % and 0.34 % respectively (Table 2). The accuracy of the method was
determined by performing the recovery experiment at three levels (50%-150%).
The % recovery obtained between 99.6– 101.5% proved that the method was
accurate (Table 3).
There was no significant change in the
system suitability factors of cefoxitin sodium when
the organic composition, flow rate and column temperature were changed. The low
values of the %RSD indicated that the method was robust enough and the results
were tabulated in Table 4.
From
the stability study, difference in % assay
for drug product with respect to initial was NMT 3.0 %. It was
established that the mobile phases, test and standard solutions were stable for
1 day on bench top and stable for 2 days in refrigerator.
Figure
2: Chromatogram for Didanosine Standard
CONCLUSION:
A
simple, rapid and reproducible RP-HPLC method was developed and validated for
the determination of didanosine. The method was
validated for system suitability, precision, accuracy, linearity, and
robustness. The system suitability parameters were within limit, hence it was
concluded that the system was suitable to perform the assay. Correlation
coefficient of 0.9991 it was closer to one, it showing good correlation between
peak area and concentration of the drug solution. The method was robustness as
observed from insignificant variation in the results of analysis by changes in
organic modifier, flow rate and temperature separately and analysis being
performed, on different systems. The developed isocratic LC method offers
simplicity, selectivity, precision and accuracy. In the proposed method
symmetrical peaks with good resolution were obtained. The RP-HPLC method was sensitive and precise. However, this method
can be used for the routine analysis of the estimation of didanosine
in pharmaceutical dosage form.
REFERENCES:
1. Sathiya Sundar R, Carolin Nimila1 I, Ashok Kumar J, Vijaya
Kumar TM, Poovi G and Sankar
Anand R. Analytical method development and validation
of different marketed didanosine tablets by RP-HPLC, International Journal of Research and Pharmaceutical Science. 1(2);
2010: 205-208.
2. Antonia Maria Cavalcanti de Oliveira, Teresa Cristina Raposo
L¨owena, L´ucio
Mendes Cabral, Elizabeth Moreira dos Santos, Carlos
Rangel Rodrigues, Helena C. Castro and Tereza Cristina dos Santos, Development and validation of a
HPLC-UV method for the determination in didanosine
tablets. Journal of Pharmaceutical and
Biomedical Analysis. 38(4); 2005: 751–756.
3. Naser L Rezk,
Richard R Tidwell and Angela DM Kashuba. Simultaneous
determination of six HIV nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors
and nevirapine by liquid chromatography with
ultraviolet absorbance detection. Journal
of Chromatography B: Analytical
technologies in the biomedical and life
sciences. 791(1-2); 2003: 137–147.
4. Stefania Notari,
Alessio Bocedi, Giuseppe Ippolito, Pasquale Narciso, Leopoldo Paolo Pucillo, Gianna Tossini, Raffaele Perrone Donnorso, Francesco Gasparrini
and Paolo Ascenzial. Simultaneous determination of 16
anti-HIV drugs in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical
technologies in the biomedical and life
sciences. 831(1-2); 2006:
258–266.
5. Maria Lluisa
Rosell-Rovira, Leonor Pou-Clave,
Rosa Lo-pez-Galera and Caries
Pascual-Mostaza. Determination of free serum didanosine by ultrafiltration and
high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography
B: Biomedical Applications. 675(1); 1996: 89-92
6. Vincent Bezya,
Philippe Morin, Philippe Couerbe , Ghis-laine Leleu and Luigi Agrofoglio, Simultaneous analysis of several antiretroviral
nucleosides in rat-plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV
using acetic acid/hydroxylamine buffer. Test of this new volatile medium-pH for
HPLC–ESI-MS/MS. Journal of
Chromatography B: Analytical
technologies in the biomedical and life
sciences. 821(2); 2005: 132–143.
7. Xavier Cahours,
Thanh Thu Tran, Nathalie Mesplet,
Claudine Kieda, Philippe Morin and Luigi Agrofoglio. Analysis of intracellular didanosine
triphosphate at sub-ppb level using LC-MS/MS. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical
Analysis. 26(5-6); 2001: 819–827
8. Stefania Notari,
Carmine Manconea, Tonino Alonzi, Marco Tripodi, Pasquale Narciso and Paolo Ascenzia.
Determination of abacavir, amprenavir,
didanosine, efavirenz, nevirapine, and stavudine
concentration in human plasma by MALDI-TOF/TOF. Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences. 863(2);
2008: 249–257.
9. Yong Huanga,
Elisabeth Zurlinden, Emil Lin, Xiaohua
Li, Jason Tokumoto, Jeff Golden, Andrew Murre, John Engstrom and John
Conte Jr. Liquid chromatographic–tandem mass spectrometric assay for the simultane-ous determination of didanosine
and stavudine in human plasma, broncho
alveolar lavage fluid, alveo-lar
cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, seminal plasma, cerebrospinal fluid
and tonsil tissue. Journal of
Chromatography B: Analytical
technologies in the biomedical and life
sciences. 799(1); 2004:
51–61Jaiprakash N Sangshetti, Parag
A Kulkarni and Devanand B Shinde. Spectrophotometric determination of didanosine in bulk and tablet formulation. Trends
in Applied Sciences Research.
2; 2007: 71-75.
Received on 19.11.2012 Accepted on 22.11.2012
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian
J. Pharm. Ana. 2(4): Oct. - Dec. 2012; Page 118-121